India has completely rejected the mention of Jammu and Kashmir in the joint statement of China and Pakistan. The Ministry of External Affairs said that Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are integral and inseparable parts of India. India also expressed strong objection to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects. This statement has come in response to the joint statement issued after the visit of Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif to China. It was said that Pakistan informed China about the situation in Jammu and Kashmir. After this, China said that the Jammu and Kashmir issue is a dispute related to history and it should be resolved peacefully under the United Nations Charter, UNSC resolutions and bilateral agreements. India also opposed China’s CPEC. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said that some CPEC projects pass through the territory of India which has been illegally and forcibly occupied by Pakistan. India opposes any effort that seeks to strengthen or legitimize Pakistan’s occupation. India also raised questions on the alleged trans-boundary water resources cooperation between China and Pakistan and said there is no common border between the two countries. India also reiterated that it never recognized the China-Pakistan border agreement of 1963. Under this agreement, Pakistan handed over the Shaksgam Valley area of Jammu and Kashmir to China, which it had illegally occupied in 1948. China will build roads, ports, rail lines in CPEC project. China-Pakistan Economic Corridor is an ambitious plan of Chinese President Xi Jinping. It was started in 2013. In this, an economic corridor is being built from Xinjiang province of China to Gwadar Port of Pakistan at a cost of 60 billion dollars (about Rs 5 lakh crore). Through this, China will have access to the Arabian Sea. Under CPEC, China is working on road, port, railway and energy projects. India has objection to CPEC. What benefit does China get from CPEC?
Source link
[ad_3]
भारत ने जम्मू-कश्मीर पर चीन-पाकिस्तान का बयान खारिज किया: कहा- दूसरे देश को टिप्पणी का हक नहीं; चीन ने इतिहास से जुड़ा विवाद बताया था
