Last Updated:
A PIL in SC sought a re-examination for all NEET-PG candidates, alleging a violation of a May 2025 Supreme Court order directing that the exam be conducted in a single shift.
The Supreme Court imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner. (File Image)
The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed a PIL seeking re-conduct of the NEET-PG 2026 examination, while pulling up the petitioner and the advocate for filing the plea. The court also imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner.
A bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe said it would ask the Bar Council of India to take action against the lawyer for allegedly misusing the process of law.
“It appears this person has become a full-time PIL litigant. Wherever exams are conducted, you go on to file petitions,” the court observed. Questioning the advocate about the earlier petitions seeking a stay on the examination, the bench said it would ask the Bar Council of India to take “serious action” against him.
The PIL sought a re-examination for all NEET-PG candidates, alleging a violation of a May 2025 Supreme Court order directing that the examination be conducted in a single shift.
During the hearing, the lawyer argued that around 2,500 candidates were unable to complete the examination at centres in Jaipur due to an internal power outage. Following the disruption, the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) announced a re-examination for the affected candidates, scheduled for September 5.
Appearing for NBEMS, its counsel told the court that the petitioners were from Noida and Punjab and had not been affected by the disruption, reported PTI.
The NBEMS counsel further submitted that the advocate had sought comments and cases from NEET-PG aspirants through social media, which had created difficulties. The counsel said the examination was conducted across 1,111 centres nationwide and the disruption was confined to two centres in Jaipur due to the power failure.
Justice Aradhe also asked whether the petitioners intended to appear for the NEET-PG examination. The counsel responded that they did not.
Justice Narasimha questioned the advocate’s involvement in the matter, saying, “Just because of getting two more extra briefs, you are seeking cases on social media.”
The court also questioned how the lawyer was concerned with the grievances of so many students and warned of the potential consequences of filing such petitions.
The Supreme Court subsequently dismissed the PIL and imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner.
About the Author
A team of reporters, writers and editors brings you news, analyses and information on college and school admissions, board and competitive exams, career options, topper interviews, job notifications, …Read More
September 04, 2026, 10:45 IST
Read More
Source link
[ad_3]
