Last Updated:
The Kerala High Court dismissed an FIR against Malayalam actor Shwetha Menon, noting the allegations lacked evidence and seemed aimed at harming her AMMA presidential campaign.
Image used for representation
The Kerala High Court said that attacking a woman’s character without any basis is a serious form of social harm while setting aside an FIR against Malayalam actor Shwetha Menon.
In his order, Justice CS Dias observed that such allegations not only damage reputation but also reflect poorly on society. The court noted that when people give more importance to a woman’s image than her work, it shows a lack of intellectual maturity.
The case against Menon was linked to allegations that she had shared or been part of obscene content through her past films and advertisements. However, the court found no merit in these claims and ruled that the charges were not supported by evidence.
The judge also pointed out that the timing of the complaint raised doubts. It was filed when Menon was contesting for the post of President of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artists (AMMA). The court said this suggested that the complaint may have been filed with a hidden motive.
“The timing of the filing of the complaint strongly indicates its mala fide and vexatious nature,” the court observed while cancelling the FIR.
After reviewing the complaint, FIR and other materials, the court concluded that the allegations were vague and lacked proof. It said the case appeared to be an attempt to damage the actor’s reputation.
“To malign the character of a woman without any foundation or substance is a pernicious form of social violence, for while it is easily uttered, the stigma it leaves behind is often indelible,” the court said.
The judge further added that women who achieve success in public life are often targeted through character attacks when they cannot be challenged on merit.
“It is often said that when a woman attains name, fame, and recognition in public life, attempts to defeat her on the basis of reasons, logic, or merit may turn difficult. Then, social shaming is the frequently deployed weapon,” the order stated.
The court stressed that progressive societies judge individuals based on their work and contributions, while regressive ones rely on defamation and moral policing.
“When a society focuses more on a woman’s image than her achievements, it exposes its own intellectual poverty,” the court said.
It also clarified that empowering women does not mean expecting them to be flawless, but recognising their individuality and achievements with fairness and respect.
“The society that tolerates the vilification of a woman out of envy or malice is nothing but an embodiment of injustice,” the court added.
The FIR had been filed under provisions of the Information Technology Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act. The complainant had objected to Menon’s roles in certain films and an advertisement, alleging they were vulgar.
Menon, however, argued that all the films mentioned had been certified and released legally, and had been available publicly for years. She also highlighted that her performance in Paleri Manikyam earned her a Kerala State Award for Best Actress.
She maintained that the complaint was filed with ill intent, especially after she entered the race for the AMMA president’s post. The court agreed that the allegations were baseless and insufficient to justify criminal charges.
Notably, Menon later went on to win the election and is now serving as the president of AMMA.
Kerala, India, India
March 19, 2026, 09:01 IST
Read More
Source link
[ad_3]
