Last Updated:
Two Faridabad students who sought CBSE re-evaluation saw marks rise in the subjects they applied for, but fall in ones they didn’t, turning a pass into ‘repeat in theory’
Both students are enrolled at DAV Public School, and their cases have surfaced amid growing unease over CBSE’s new online scanned marking (OSM) system. (AI Generated)
Two Class 12 students in Faridabad who sought re-evaluation to increase their CBSE scores have instead ended up worse off, losing marks in subjects they never applied to have rechecked.
According to a Times of India report, both students are enrolled at DAV Public School, and their cases have surfaced amid growing unease over CBSE’s new online scanned marking (OSM) system, which has drawn a string of complaints this year over evaluation errors, disputed answer sheets and inconsistent revisions.
In the first case, Pushkar Sharma had sought re-evaluation only in Chemistry and Home Science after Class 12 results came out on May 13. On paper, the request paid off, with Chemistry marks moving up from 42, which had meant repeat in theory (RT), to a passing 52, while his Home Science score climbed from 70 to 79.
But when the revised marksheet came, the family found Pushkar’s Mathematics marks had slipped from 46 to 40, enough to flip the overall result back to RT, even though he never applied for re-evaluation in the subject.
Fellow student Aayushman Mishra’s experience followed an almost identical pattern. He had requested re-evaluation only for Physics and Computer Science, and his marks improved in both. Yet the updated marksheet showed his Chemistry marks cut from a passing 52 to 43, marked RT, even though no re-evaluation had been sought for that subject at all.
The changes pushed both students’ overall status from pass to RT, pushing their college admission plans into uncertainty just as universities begin closing application windows.
Their families have since filed complaints with CBSE’s regional office, arguing that marks in subjects outside the original re-evaluation request should never have been touched, and warning that the tightening counselling and admission timelines put an entire academic year at risk.
The school, for its part, has written to the CBSE controller of examinations demanding an urgent review of how marks in unrelated subjects came to be revised.
The TOI report quoted the school’s principal as saying that the episode has taken a visible toll on both families. “The children are under immense stress. One parent told me they are not leaving the child alone even for a while because of the anxiety this has caused,” she said.
According to the school, CBSE officials informally attributed the changes to a ‘policy matter’, suggesting that while marks had genuinely gone up in re-evaluated papers, grace marks awarded earlier had simultaneously been withdrawn elsewhere.
The principal rejected that explanation when it was raised with her. “We are unaware of any such policy, and no such notification has ever been issued by CBSE. If that is the basis, it should have been communicated transparently,” she told TOI.
She cautioned that without an urgent correction, both students could be pushed into compartment exams despite having genuinely scored higher in the subjects they wanted to improve in. With admission deadlines closing in, the families are pressing CBSE to fix the anomaly before it costs the students a year.
About the Author
The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, …Read More
Faridabad, India, India
Read More
Source link
[ad_3]
