New Delhi1 minute ago
- copy link
Sonia said- The assassination of a sitting head of state amid ongoing diplomatic discussions is a serious breakdown in contemporary international relations.
Congress Rajya Sabha MP Sonia Gandhi has raised questions about the Indian government’s silence on the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He said- Delhi’s silence is surprising, it is not neutrality, but a retreat from responsibility.
In an article published in the Indian Express on Tuesday, he wrote – On March 1, Iran confirmed that its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei was assassinated a day earlier in a targeted attack by America and Israel. The assassination of a sitting head of state amid diplomatic negotiations reflects a serious rift in current international relations.
Sonia wrote that the Indian government neither condemned the killing nor gave any clear response to the violation of Iran’s sovereignty. Modi ignored the US-Israeli attack, only condemning Iran’s retaliation against the UAE. The PM later spoke of ‘deep concern’ and ‘dialogue and diplomacy’, even though the attack took place at a time when the diplomatic process was underway.
5 important things about Sonia Gandhi’s article…
1. Killing without declaring war
This killing was carried out without any formal declaration of war and at a time when the negotiation process was going on. According to Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, it is wrong to use or threaten force against the borders of any country or its political independence. Target killing of a sitting head of state is against these rules. If even the world’s largest democracy does not raise its voice on this, international rules may weaken.
2. Prime Minister’s visit to Israel
The Prime Minister had returned from a trip to Israel just 48 hours before the assassination. There he reiterated his support for the Benjamin Netanyahu government. This comes as there is worldwide outrage over the killing of large numbers of civilians, including women and children, in the Gaza conflict.
3. Attitude of Global South and BRICS countries
Many countries of the Global South and BRICS partners Russia and China have maintained distance in this matter. India’s open support at such a time, without a clear moral stance, may send the wrong message. According to Sonia Gandhi, its impact will not be limited to regional politics only, but will be visible across the world.
4. Condemnation of bombings and target killings
The Indian National Congress clearly condemns the bombing and target killing on Iranian soil. This is a dangerous step for the region and the world. The party extends its condolences to the people of Iran and the Shia community around the world.
5. Reference to the Constitution
Article 51 of the Constitution of India states that disputes between countries should be resolved through dialogue, equality of all countries should be respected and there should be no interference in anyone’s internal affairs. These principles have long been the basis of India’s foreign policy. The current silence is inconsistent with these principles.
Sonia mentioned the relations between India and Iran
Sonia Gandhi said that in 1994, some OIC countries had tried to bring a resolution against India on the Kashmir issue in the United Nations Human Rights Commission. At that time, Iran played an important role in stopping it, due to which the Kashmir issue could not reach the international level.
Iran allowed India diplomatic presence in Zahedan near the Pakistan border, which is important for balancing Gwadar Port and the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. In April 2001, the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had reiterated the deep relations between the two countries during his visit to Tehran.
Sonia’s question of Israel-India relations and credibility
Sonia wrote that in recent years India-Israel relations have grown in the fields of defence, agriculture and technology. India has relations with both Tehran and Tel Aviv, so it can appeal for restraint. But this is possible only if its credibility remains intact and it adopts a principle-based stance.
Sonia Gandhi said that about one crore Indians live and work in Gulf countries. In crises like Gulf War, Yemen, Iraq and Syria, India was able to protect its citizens because it was considered an independent and impartial country and not a representative of any power.
He said that after independence, India’s foreign policy was based on non-alignment which was not passive neutrality but strategic autonomy. The current situation indicates a weakening of that stance. If India does not speak clearly on the disregard for sovereignty in the Iran case, how will smaller countries trust it in the future?
Sonia demanded debate in Parliament
Sonia Gandhi said that in the next meeting of Parliament, there should be an open debate on the issue of target killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the Indian Government’s silence on it and the weakening of the principles of international law and sovereignty due to this.
The destruction of international norms and increasing instability in West Asia are linked to India’s strategic and moral interests.
He said that India has long been talking about ‘Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam’, which is not just a formal slogan but a commitment to justice, restraint and dialogue. At a time when the rules-based system is under pressure, remaining silent is an abdication of responsibility.
………………………….
Also read this article of Sonia Gandhi…
Sonia said – Iran is an old friend, India’s silence is troubling: Government should speak strongly on Israeli attacks, it is not too late.
Congress Chairperson Sonia Gandhi had condemned the Israeli attack on Iran. He wrote in an article in The Hindu that Israel itself is a nuclear power, but Iran is being targeted even though it does not have nuclear weapons. This is Israel’s double standards. He also said that Iran has been an old friend of India and India’s silence in such a situation is disturbing. Read the full news…
Source link
[ad_3]
