The brutal mob lynching of 27-year-old Hindu youth Dipu Chandra Das that took place on December 19 in Bangladesh has not only raised serious questions about the safety of minorities in South Asia, but has also sparked a new debate about the presentation of this incident in the international media. There is a sharp reaction in India regarding a report published in America’s prestigious newspaper New York Times (NYT).
It is alleged that in this report, instead of directly presenting the mob lynching of Dipu Chandra Das, it was linked to the larger issue of increasing religious intolerance in South Asia. One intention behind this was to show that bangladesh What happened to Dipu Chandra Das in 2007, continues to happen in other countries of South Asia.
In English, the word Normalize is used for this, in which to show the seriousness of an incident, it is presented in a normal form. The American newspaper did the same in this incident also. He mentioned the examples of Pakistan, Bangladesh and India in the mob lynching of Deep Chandra Das and wrote that in Pakistan too, incidents of mob lynching have increased rapidly in many cases related to religion. Also in Afghanistan also, people of minority Hindu and Sikh community have migrated due to security reasons.
Example of Kerala and incomplete information
Regarding India, it has also been written that in India too, Hindu cow vigilantes and self-appointed vigilantes have targeted Muslims and other minorities. Apart from this, there is also mention of the incident in Kerala, in which last week some people killed a migrant laborer thinking he was a Bangladeshi. However, it is not mentioned anywhere that this incident took place on suspicion of theft and this incident had nothing to do with religion. This is called ideological mixing.
Questions on writers too
The authors of this report are Saif Hasnat and Mujeeb Mashal. Social media and some analysts claim that such articles have already appeared in the name of these two journalists, in which they have been accused of anti-India tendencies. However, there has been no response from NYT on this.
Let us tell you that Dipu Chandra Das used to work in a garment factory. On December 19, a religious debate took place during a discussion regarding Friday prayers in the factory. It is alleged that during this time Deepu was accused of blasphemy. After this the frenzied mob beat him, hanged him from a tree and later burnt him. This incident was so cruel that its pictures and videos went viral on social media.
The bitter truth of today is that if Dipu Chandra Das was not a Hindu and after this he was brutally murdered in this manner, then this incident would have become the biggest headline in the world. From the United Nations to human rights organizations and Western countries expressed concern over this incident and campaigns were launched to get justice for Dipu Chandra Das. But the sad thing is that Dipu Chandra Das was a Hindu and because of being a Hindu, his brutal murder was also accepted as normal by the western media and many countries. And this article is also an example of that.
Silence in Bangladesh, turmoil in India
About 13 million Hindu minorities live in Bangladesh, but after the murder of Dipu Das, large-scale protests were not seen there. Less than 100 people also participated in the demonstration in support of the family in Mymensingh district. On the contrary, thousands of people demonstrated in many cities including Delhi and Kolkata in India demanding the safety of Bangladeshi Hindus. There were demonstrations outside the Bangladesh High Commission in Delhi, while in Kolkata the police even had to resort to lathicharge. These incidents have also fueled diplomatic tension between the two countries.
Celebration and concern on social media
Another worrying aspect of this matter is social media. Investigation has revealed that hateful and celebratory comments were made from both India and Bangladesh on the video of Dipu Das’s murder. However, it is also feared that many of these accounts may have been created for fake or inflammatory purposes. Many people in Bangladesh are celebrating this on social media. Big Muslim religious leaders and leaders are also included in these. The name of one such leader is Zubair Ahmed Tasrif, who is going to participate in the parliamentary elections to be held in February. But on the murder of Dipu Chandra Das, this person says that those who carried out mob lynching have filled the people of Bangladesh with happiness.
Just think, how will that country, whose people are openly celebrating the murder of Dipu Chandra Das, provide him justice? In most of the countries of the world, the minority community remains particularly united and lakhs of people come out on the streets on such incidents, but this has not happened till now in Bangladesh.
What do the statistics say?
Just as today 23 percent Hindus in Bangladesh have reduced to only 8 percent, similarly in the future these Hindus will gradually disappear completely. On this situation, we are reminded of the statement of Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, which he gave on 26 August last year. Even at that time, after the coup, violent incidents were taking place against Hindus in Bangladesh. And Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had linked these incidents to the slogan of ‘If you divide, you will be cut’ and had said that if Hindus do not unite, they will be targeted in the same way and the same is happening even today.
The Hindus living in Bangladesh today were the Hindus of India before 1947, but the tragedy of partition made these Hindus a minority in Bangladesh. Today the situation has become such that there is no one in Bangladesh who understands the value of the lives of Hindus.
Politics also heated up on this
Politics on this issue has also intensified in India. Congress leader Digvijay Singh said that the reaction to the alleged action against Muslims in India is visible in Bangladesh. BJP retaliated strongly on this statement and termed it as appeasement politics. BJP leaders raised the question as to why the opposition leaders, who are vocal on the issue of Palestine, are silent on the atrocities being committed on Hindus in Bangladesh.
—- End —-
Source link
[ad_3]
