A very shocking and big political upset has come to light during the Madhya Pradesh Rajya Sabha elections. The nomination papers of Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan have been rejected, after which the politics of the state heated up. After this decision, while Congress has termed it as ‘murder of democracy’, BJP is calling it completely justified. Let us tell you that elections are to be held on three seats of Rajya Sabha. Two seats are certain to go to BJP’s account. BJP had declared Mahesh Kevat as its candidate on the third seat. There was a competition between Kevat and Meenakshi. Now after the cancellation of nomination, the way for Kevat to enter Rajya Sabha seems to be clear. What happened in the closed room of the returning officer? Under which rule was Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination rejected? And what are the legal implications in this decision? Read the inside story and expert analysis of this entire incident… From 2 pm to 6:30 pm: Events in the Returning Officer’s room Scrutiny of nomination papers for the Rajya Sabha elections took place as per the schedule on June 9. At 2 pm, a commotion started in the Returning Officer (RO) room of the Assembly. RO’s decision on Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination According to the Returning Officer, a private complaint was filed against Meenakshi Natarajan in the Telangana court. The court had issued summons on 17 September 2025 and ordered him to appear. The Returning Officer had three observations.. Final Judgment: The order said that submission of incomplete affidavit (Form 26) and concealment of material facts is proved. Therefore, the nomination was canceled under point 10(xiii) of Chapter 6 of the Handbook. Expert View: Why are questions being raised on the decision? According to former Principal Secretary Bhagwandev Israni, the decision to cancel the nomination cannot be considered completely correct as per the rules. He pointed out three legal complications on the basis of the handbook. What legal options does Congress have now? Option 1: Congress may seek review from the Election Commission saying it was only a personal complaint and not a formal FIR. Therefore, its mention in the affidavit was not mandatory. Option 2: Congress can challenge the RO order by filing a petition in the High Court. This is considered to be the most quick and practical legal option. Option 3: After the election and the results, Congress can challenge the results through an election petition, although this will be a lengthy process. Also read this news… Nomination of MP-Rajya Sabha candidate Natarajan rejected: Congress bid – will go to court against it, protest outside the Election Commission in Delhi-Bhopal The nomination of Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajan from the third Rajya Sabha seat of Madhya Pradesh was rejected on Tuesday. Returning Officer Arvind Sharma took this decision over BJP’s objection. According to political experts, now BJP candidates are unopposed on all three seats. Read the full news…
Source link
[ad_3]
मीनाक्षी घबराकर बाहर भागी, सीनियर नेताओं को बुलाया: कांग्रेस प्रत्याशी के नामांकन रद्द होने की इनसाइड स्टोरी, एक्सपर्ट बोले- रिटर्निंग ऑफिसर का फैसला सही नहीं – Madhya Pradesh News
