New Delhi9 minutes ago
- copy link
On August 17, the house of an accused was demolished with a bulldozer in Udaipur, Rajasthan.
“A house is everyone’s dream, it is a struggle of years and a sign of respect. If the house is demolished then the officer will have to prove that this was the last resort. The officer himself cannot become a judge.” The Supreme Court made this comment on Wednesday while giving its verdict on the bulldozer action.
The bench of Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Vishwanathan issued 15 guidelines for the entire country on bulldozer action.
The court said that if the decision to demolish the house has been taken, then 15 days’ time should be given. Videography of the house demolition action is necessary. If any officer violates the guidelines, he will get the property rebuilt at his own expense and will also pay compensation.
Everyone lives in this dream of having their own house, their own courtyard. It is the desire of human heart that the dream of owning a house should never be lost.
After continuous bulldozer action in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, Jamiat-Ulema-e-Hind had filed a petition in the Supreme Court. It was alleged that Muslims are being targeted in BJP ruled states and bulldozer action is being taken.
The central government had argued that the court should not tie our hands with its decision. No one’s property has been demolished because he has committed a crime. Action has been taken under the law against the illegal encroachment of the accused.
4 final comments of Supreme Court on bulldozer action
1. Every man’s dream is to have a house, what can be taken away Justice BR Gavai said, “A man always dreams that his house should never be taken away. Everyone dreams of having a roof over their house. Can the authorities take away the roof of a person who is accused of a crime? Accused Whether he is guilty or not, can his house be demolished without following due procedure?”
2. Officers are not judges, they cannot decide who is guilty. The Supreme Court said, “If a person is merely an accused, then demolishing his property is completely unconstitutional. The authorities cannot decide who is guilty, they themselves cannot be the judge whether someone is guilty or not.” This is crossing the boundaries.”
3. Officers should not be spared for actions with malicious intent. The Supreme Court said, “If an officer demolishes a person’s house wrongly because he is an accused, it is wrong. If the officer takes the law into his own hands, then action should be taken. Arbitrary and unilateral action cannot be taken.” If an officer does this, there should be a system to take action against him. The officer cannot be spared.
4. Demolishing the house is the last resort, this has to be proved. Justice Gavai said, “A house is an issue of socio-economic fabric. It is not just a house, it is a struggle of years, it gives a sense of dignity. If the house is demolished then the officer will have to prove that it is It was the last resort. Unless someone is found guilty, demolishing his house is punishing his entire family.”
To know every moment detail of the Supreme Court on bulldozer action, go through the blog given below…
Supreme Court’s comments in the last 2 hearings
September 17: Center said – do not tie hands, court said – sky will not burst The Supreme Court had said on September 17 that bulldozer action will not take place till October 1. Till the next hearing, not a single bulldozer action should be taken in the country. When the Center questioned this order that the hands of constitutional institutions cannot be tied like this. Then Justice BR Gavai and Justice KV Vishwanathan said – If the proceedings are stopped for two weeks then the sky will not burst. Read the full news…
September 12: Supreme Court said- bulldozer action on laws The Supreme Court had also said on September 12 that the bulldozer action is like running a bulldozer on the laws of the country. The matter was before the bench of Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice SVN Bhatti. In fact, a family in Gujarat was threatened with bulldozer action by the municipality. The petitioner is a co-owner of a land in Kathlal of Kheda district. Read the full news…
Bulldozer action took place in 3 states 1. Madhya Pradesh
On August 24, the bungalow of Haji Shahzad Ali, accused in the case of stone pelting on police in Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh, was demolished with a bulldozer.
Action against the accused of stone pelting on police in Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh in August. Within 24 hours of stone pelting at the Kotwali police station in Chhatarpur, Madhya Pradesh on August 21, the government had razed a three-storey mansion worth Rs 20 crore built in 20 thousand square feet. . 2. Rajasthan In August, a bulldozer ran into the house of the accused after a stabbing in Udaipur, Rajasthan. A child studying in class 10 in a government school in Udaipur had stabbed another and injured him. This was followed by arson and violent demonstrations across the city. On August 17, bulldozer action took place at the house of the accused student. Earlier, on the instructions of the government, the Forest Department had given a notice to the accused’s father Salim Shaikh to vacate the house built in an illegal colony. 3. Uttar Pradesh In June, 6 properties of 2 accused were vandalized in Moradabad and Ballia. In Moradabad, a bulldozer was run over the house of the person who tried to kidnap a married woman. The accused had shot the woman’s parents and brother who were protesting against the kidnapping. At the same time, in Bareilly, the hotel of hotel owner Zeeshan, who had beaten young Sunny to death over a bread dispute, was razed to the ground. Sunny’s birthday was on 26th June. He was murdered on this very day.
…………..
Also read these news of bulldozer action and Supreme Court…
Bulldozer action 12 thousand times in 2 years in MP, Kamal Nath did trial, Shivraj gave speed, why is Mohan also on the same path?
Bulldozer action in Madhya Pradesh started in the 90s. At that time bulldozer was a symbol of development. Former CM Babulal Gaur, while being the Urban Administration Minister in Patwa government, had used bulldozer to remove encroachment. Read the full news…
New bench will decide on AMU minority status: Supreme Court overturns 1967 decision; In which it was said – This is a Central University, not a Minority Institute.
Now a new bench of 3 judges will decide on the minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). A bench of 7 judges of the Supreme Court overturned its own decision of 1967 with a majority of 4:3. On November 8, the Supreme Court said that an institution cannot lose minority status merely because it has been created under a central law. Read the full news…
Source link
[ad_3]
