After the SIT investigation, a case has been registered against 8 people in the case of theft of offerings in Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple, the center of faith of crores of devotees. Trust general secretary Champat Rai and member Anil Mishra have resigned from their posts. Along with this, as the investigation is progressing, new and shocking revelations are coming to light. Now many big information is coming out quoting sources related to the investigation of the Special Investigation Team (SIT).
According to sources, the employee Manish Kumar Yadav, deployed during the counting of notes, was seen allegedly stealing several times in the CCTV footage. Despite this, no immediate effective action was taken against him. Investigation has also revealed that Manish Kumar Yadav is a relative of Ramshankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav and he was given work in the counting process on the basis of this recommendation. Meanwhile, the SIT in its preliminary investigation has not only identified the incident of alleged theft but has also identified many procedural shortcomings in the entire system.
What came to light in the SIT investigation?
According to sources, preliminary investigation by the SIT found that there were serious deficiencies in the system of counting the offerings and maintaining records. The process of keeping gifts and offerings separately was also not systematic. The investigation also found that the internal control system was very weak and there was no clear system of monitoring and accountability in place. Considering these shortcomings as serious, the report recommends taking corrective steps and taking necessary action against those responsible.
What was said in the FIR
In the FIR lodged at the Ram Janmabhoomi police station on June 25, 2026 by Krishna Mohan, a member of the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust, it has been said that based on the preliminary investigation of the SIT, the available oral, documentary and electronic evidence, it was prima facie clear that some personnel engaged in the counting process had systematically and repeatedly committed theft and embezzlement of the amount of donations and offerings. In the FIR, it has been said that a case will be registered against Avinash Shukla, Anukalp Mishra, Luvkush Mishra, Manish Kumar Yadav, Karunesh Pandey and Ramashankar under theft, embezzlement, criminal breach of trust, criminal conspiracy and other related sections. Apart from this, the need to investigate the role of Subhash Srivastava, Ramshankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav and other related persons has also been mentioned in the FIR.
How did the whole matter come to light?
According to the information, in the last week of May, the officials associated with the trust matched the data of the amount being deposited in the bank and the offerings coming out of the donation boxes. During this period, there was an unusual decrease in the amount coming out of some donation boxes. It is said that normally 7 to 8 lakh rupees were taken out from one donation box, but for some consecutive days there was a shortage in the bundles of 500 rupees. Following this suspicion, additional secret cameras were installed in the note counting room.
What was seen in hidden cameras
According to sources, after watching the footage recorded for a week, the entire process allegedly came to light. The investigation claims that while counting the notes, some employees deliberately stood in front of the normal CCTV cameras, while their other colleague used to take out the notes from the bundles of notes prepared behind and hide them in clothes. This activity was not clearly visible in the front cameras, but the entire incident was reportedly recorded in the recordings of the hidden cameras. The investigation reportedly revealed another method. According to sources, the note counting staff used to add extra notes while preparing the bundle. Vouchers were made on the basis of the number of bundles in the bank and each note was not counted separately. It is alleged that while taking the money from the temple to the bank, the extra notes kept in the bundles were taken out. Due to this, the matching of voucher and deposited amount also appeared to be correct and theft was also allegedly done. Investigation has revealed that the role of Anukalp Mishra and his brother-in-law Lavkush Mishra, who were involved in the process of preparing the voucher, is also being investigated. Police have already recovered around Rs 10 lakh from Lavkush Mishra’s house.
Got the job on the basis of kinship and recommendation
According to sources, many employees counting the notes were connected to this process through some acquaintance or recommendation. Investigation has also revealed that Ramshankar Yadav alias Tinnu Yadav, who was working as an administrator, had engaged his relative Manish Kumar Yadav for this work. Similarly, Anukalp Mishra, who has been working for years, also involved his brother-in-law Luvkush Mishra in this process. The investigating agencies are now trying to find out how transparent the appointments process was and at what levels there were lapses in the monitoring system.
Investigation is also being linked to bank account
According to sources, after matching the bank accounts of one of the arrested accused, the investigating agencies found some suspicious transactions. Trust officials matched the amount deposited in the bank and the relevant dates. The investigation is now also moving forward on the aspect of how the allegedly stolen amount was used.
—- End —-
Source link
[ad_3]
