Last Updated:
The political establishment has split into two halves—an elite centre pushing a sattvic global brand and a desperate regional apparatus performing emergency culinary retreats
The BRICS all-vegetarian fare (left) and Suvendu Adkhikari having fish ‘bhog’ in Bengal (right) reveal two competing sides of India. (News18)
In the high-stakes theatre of modern Indian governance and politics, the ultimate test of federalism and the power of state machinery is no longer being fought over GST allocations or language rows. The fault line has shifted from language to palette.
The new battleground is the menu card. The Indian State appears to be caught between two competing images—a clean, uniform, largely vegetarian image it wants to project to the world, and the meat- and fish-eating reality that shapes politics in many of its states. The reality of this dietary friction is that the political establishment has split into two irreconcilable halves—one is an elite, bureaucratic centre pushing a sattvic global brand, while the other is a desperate regional apparatus performing emergency culinary retreats to survive.
This institutional split was exposed during the international gala dinner hosted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Curated for global dignitaries, the menu was a flawless, entirely vegetarian, millet-heavy showcase of ancient wellness. For New Delhi’s senior policy makers, an all-vegetarian international banquet is the ultimate soft-power tool, a visual statement that modern, corporate-ready Indian identity is inherently vegetarian.
ALSO READ | BRICS Menu Isn’t The First All-Veg Spread For World Leaders — Here’s Proof
But this grand, central blueprint falls apart the moment it collides with regional ground realities.
Plate First, Politics Later
Just a few days prior to the BRICS summit, high-profile preacher Dhirendra Shastri, popularly known as Bageshwar Baba, triggered a wave of local outrage by publicly branding Bengalis who consume non-vegetarian food during Durga Puja as ‘Pakhandi’ (sinners). To a regional population that views faith through a Shakta lens, where the deity is offered fish, the preacher’s remarks felt like blatant cultural colonisation from the Hindi heartland.
ALSO READ | Opinion | Veg Or Non-Veg? Why What Bageshwar Baba Says Doesn’t Matter
The panic within the local right-wing and ruling BJP driven ecosystem was immediate. Realising that a food diktat is political hara-kiri, West Bengal Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari executed a defensive manoeuvre on Kaushiki Amavasya.
He did not defend the preacher through statements or clarifications. Instead, he drove straight to Kolkata’s historic Kalighat Temple to be photographed eating traditional fish ‘bhog’, complete with a massive fish head. The political message was delivered on a banana leaf—to survive regionally, you must surrender to the local palate.
Ultimately, India’s food plate has become the ultimate proxy war for federal autonomy. The establishment is discovering that while you can easily mandate an all-vegetarian menu for an international summit, you cannot dictate the culinary soul of India’s states. New Delhi may hold the diplomatic pen, but it is the regional plate that holds the power.
Quick Answers
Ask News18Preacher Dhirendra Shastri, also known as Bageshwar Baba, triggered local outrage by publicly branding Bengalis who consume non-vegetarian food during Durga Puja as ‘Pakhandi’ (sinners). This sparked backlash because the regional population views faith through a Shakta lens, where deities are traditionally offered fish.
Ask News18About the Author
Madhuparna Das, Associate Editor (policy) at CNN News 18, has been in journalism for nearly 14 years. She has extensively been covering politics, policy, crime and internal security issues. She has co…Read More
September 15, 2026, 09:29 IST
Read More
Source link
[ad_3]
