For the first time, BJP is going to become the mayor of BMC, the richest and largest municipal corporation not only in the country but in entire Asia. Not only BMC, Mahayuti has defeated the entire opposition along with the Thackeray brothers by hoisting the saffron flag in 25 out of 29 municipal corporations of Maharashtra.
Now the question is what will happen to Bala Saheb’s legacy. What will happen to the politics of Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray? bmc elections Let’s try to understand the meaning of the results.
The big thing about the results of BMC elections is that after 25 years, Shiv Sena’s fort in BMC has collapsed.
Now the next question is about Bala Saheb’s legacy. The question is about the existence of Shiv Sena ruling in BMC, because the people of Maharashtra have completely rejected the politics which the Thackeray brothers joined hands to save after 20 years. When Uddhav’s Shiv Sena left Mumbai after 25 years, there Raj Thackeray Seemed longing for double figures.
It is clear from the results that Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray The pairing was rejected by the people of Mumbai. The people of Maharashtra did not understand the fanatical Maratha politics. The side effect of violence against North Indians was also visible. Not only this, Thackeray Brothers failed to bring non-Maratha voters along. At the same time, Muslim voters completely distanced themselves from this alliance.
There was silence in Matoshree, where the election results were celebrated for the last 25 years, on Friday. Now after these results many questions are being raised. As-
Did Uddhav suffer loss because of Raj Thackeray?
Did separation from Congress prove costly for Uddhav?
Did the public trust Shinde’s Thackeray legacy more?
Will Raj-Uddhav duo fight together in future also?
And what will happen to Uddhav’s Shiv Sena now?
Let us tell you that after the setback in Maharashtra Assembly, Uddhav had changed his strategy. Kept distance from Maha Vikas Aghadi, forgetting years old enmity and joined hands with brother. But now questions have arisen on Uddhav’s political future. Because the legacy of Balasaheb that Uddhav mentions does not seem to be translating into results. However, there are some other reasons for the results against Uddhav in BMC.
For example, Shiv Sena, which ruled BMC for 25 years, also faced the challenge of anti-incumbency. Uddhav and Raj laid more emphasis on press conferences rather than rallies. Due to which he might not be able to connect himself with the public. Targeting only Marathi voters proved costly, due to which the rest of the voters got dispersed.
Pictures of violence against Hindi speaking people also surfaced. There was politics regarding Hindi in the syllabus of Maharashtra and Raj Thackeray promised to make the mayor of Maharashtra a Marathi person. But all these issues seemed to be a complete failure.
—- End —-
Source link
[ad_3]
