राहुल गांधी महाराष्ट्र में ही वोटों की चोरी की बात क्यों कर रहे हैं, हरियाणा-दिल्ली की क्यों नहीं?

Rahul Gandhi is raising the issue of special intensive revision (SIR) of the voter list in Bihar in his style. He is accusing the BJP government of ‘theft of votes’ at the Center. Rahul Gandhi had started accusing the Maharashtra assembly elections after the Maharashtra assembly elections, but now they are raising it more vigorously.

The Congress is going to contest the Bihar election with RJD under the banner of the Grand Alliance. Like in support of RJD Rahul Gandhi The caste was raising the issue of census, they are raising the issue of SIR in the same way. Along with disturbances in Maharashtra elections, Rahul Gandhi is also telling a case study in Karnataka.

Tejashwi Yadav has started even threatening the election boycott about SIR, but the final decision is yet to be taken. BJP MP Nishikant Dubey has retaliated on Rahul Gandhi’s statements on the issue of SIR. It is said that his statement is showing that he is not aware of the law passed by his father … This law is the law passed by Rajiv Gandhi to attract young voters … In 2003, a similar SIR was done in Bihar.

This issue is now getting more catching up, but first the timing was being raised, not opposing SIR. And, the question, NDA’s ally TDP leader N. Chandrababu Naidu has also picked up. They are also against the Sir being done just before the election.

Everyone has their own way of protest, their own account. Time also happens. The same is with Rahul Gandhi. And, on raising the question of Rahul Gandhi, his coalition partner in Jammu and Kashmir, Omar Abdullah has also raised questions – and the reason for raising questions on Rahul Gandhi’s stand is also the same.

If seen, like Maharashtra, before and after it, Haryana And assembly elections have also been held in Delhi. The results have also come together – then why does Rahul Gandhi feel that theft has been done only in Maharashtra.

How was the theft of votes?

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, has alleged that elections are being stolen in the country. And, it has been announced that the opposition coalition in this case is not going to sit silent. The opposition will fight from Parliament to the road. Rahul Gandhi, who was facing the media in the Parliament complex, said, it is not just about Bihar … In Maharashtra too, we also stolen … election Commission Asked for voter list, asked for videos … but did not give us.

Rahul Gandhi claims that one crore new voters were added before the elections in Maharashtra. And, the government changed the law of giving videography. Rahul Gandhi has made these allegations before, and has started repeating the issue in Bihar.

Rahul Gandhi is also citing a case study in this regard. They say, Karnataka I have studied, and have caught fierce theft … I can tell you in Black and White, and where and how is the stolen being stolen? We have understood the game.

Rahul Gandhi further said, we chose a constituency in Karnataka, and understood it completely … took six months and we have understood their whole system of stealing elections.

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi wrote on social site X, ‘Elections are being stolen in India, this is the truth! We showed everyone how match fixing took place in Maharashtra. Checked a Lok Sabha seat in Karnataka – there was a large number of votes theft, soon they will bring it to the public. In Bihar, the votes of SC, ST, OBC and minority brothers and sisters are being stolen in Bihar. We will not sit silent … India alliance will fight the fight for public rights from Parliament to the road.

Why did this happen only in Maharashtra?

Rahul Gandhi is accusing the theft of votes in Maharashtra, but the Lok Sabha seat of Karnataka is elected for the case study. Couldn’t this case study happen in Maharashtra? Is it necessary for the Congress to be in power in the state for such a case study? Or is there something else?

Did Rahul Gandhi make a case study in Karnataka because the Congress could not get success like Maharashtra in the Lok Sabha elections? And did Rahul Gandhi not get the case study done in Maharashtra because the Congress got the most seats there?

When Rahul Gandhi had earlier raised this issue, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah took a dig at the Congress leader. Omar Abdullah said, if you have a problem with EVMs, then you should have problems in every election.

Giving his own examples about the election victory and defeat, Omar Abdullah had said, I lost in the Lok Sabha elections, and won in the assembly elections … My party got a majority … I accepted both results, and never blamed EVMs.

In a conversation with news agency PTI, Omar Abdullah said, “When more than a hundred MPs come from the same EVM, you celebrate your party as a victory … You cannot say after a few days and say that we do not like voting from EVMs … Because, now, the election results are not coming as we want.”

If Rahul Gandhi understands the theft formula for the theft of votes in a Lok Sabha seat in Karnataka, then why not say anything on the BJP’s less seats in Uttar Pradesh? In the 2024 general election, the BJP could not get a majority on its own, its seats in UP were completely reduced, and lost the seat of Ayodhya.

Rahul Gandhi Jharkhand The assembly elections were also not questioned, which took place with Maharashtra elections. The BJP won the most seats in the Maharashtra assembly elections, but was completely missed in Jharkhand.

Assembly elections were held in Haryana before Maharashtra, and after Maharashtra in Delhi – BJP has won the election by winning elections in Maharashtra as well as Haryana and Delhi, but Rahul Gandhi is only taking the name of Maharashtra – this is only the important question.

—- End —-