कॉकरोच पार्टी को मुंबई में प्रदर्शन की अनुमति नहीं मिली: CEC ज्ञानेश कुमार के खिलाफ जुटना था, दीपके बोले- अब 2 अक्टूबर को जेल भरो आंदोलन होगा

कॉकरोच पार्टी को मुंबई में प्रदर्शन की अनुमति नहीं मिली:  CEC ज्ञानेश कुमार के खिलाफ जुटना था, दीपके बोले- अब 2 अक्टूबर को जेल भरो आंदोलन होगा




Mumbai Police did not give permission to the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) demonstration to be held at Shivaji Park on October 2. This demonstration was to be against the Election Commission (ECI) and Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Police cited High Court instructions, lack of permission from BMC and the possibility of traffic being affected. Police also said that Shivaji Park falls in the silence zone and there are residential areas around it. The protest is likely to cause traffic jams and affect the movement of emergency vehicles to nearby hospitals. The organizers have been advised to find another venue in Mumbai. On the other hand, CJP founder Abhijeet Deepke said – such efforts to suppress the voice of citizens are not acceptable. If we are denied the right to protest, CJP will launch a jail bharo movement in Mumbai on Gandhi Jayanti. September 24 – CJP had given an ultimatum to Gyanesh Kumar to resign within 48 hours. Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) had on September 24 given an ultimatum to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar to resign within 48 hours. The party said that if he does not resign, there will be agitation across the country and after that they will demonstrate in Delhi. CJP founder Abhijeet Deepke said in a press conference in Delhi – Gyanesh Kumar is the biggest traitor of this country. He deleted more than 13 crore votes in the country through SIR. The right to vote is being taken away from the people. Deepke said- Democracy means that the people elect their government. But ever since Gyanesh Kumar became the Chief Election Commissioner, the government has been deciding who will vote and who will not. Votes were deleted on Mamta-Kejriwal seats, Deepke’s 4 allegations… 1. BJP scared after the results of 2024: BJP could not get majority in the 2024 elections. After raising the slogan of ‘crossing 400’ it came down to 240 seats. After this he realized that regional parties were becoming stronger. 2. Accusation of defeating regional leaders one by one: Be it Uddhav Thackeray, NCP, MK Stalin, Pinarayi Vijayan, Arvind Kejriwal or Mamata Banerjee, all these Chief Ministers in Maharashtra were defeated one by one. This cannot be a mere coincidence. All of them came together in 2024 and together they campaigned against the BJP. 3. Question of attempt to eliminate the opposition: Was this step taken only to eliminate strong opposition leaders? We have no special attachment to the opposition or any particular party. But if the entire opposition is eliminated in democracy, can it be called democracy? Two Election Commissioners lodged written objections 14 times in 10 months According to The Indian Express, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi lodged written objections 14 times in 10 months. He said that some decisions were taken without his knowledge and termed some steps as ‘unauthorized and illegal’. Commission’s claim – Sandhu-Joshi had objected to the order of the deputation officer. The Commission issued a press release on Saturday saying that the letters sent by Sandhu and Joshi to the Cabinet Secretary were related to the officer who had come on deputation. The Indian Express claimed that Sandhu and Joshi had objected to the order, which was expected to limit the power to add, delete names and update records to the voter list at the central level. The Commission said that the work-redistribution orders issued by the concerned officer were never implemented. The Commission clarified that all the instructions given by the Election Commissioners to the officials will be followed carefully. A committee will be formed to examine ECINET under the chairmanship of a Senior Deputy Election Commissioner and an independent expert from IIT/IIIT. The Commission also gave clarification regarding Form-6. If the name is not there in the SIR, then you will be able to apply. According to the Commission, people whose names are missing in the SIR can apply to the concerned ERO for adding their names as part of the process of continuously updating the voter list. This also includes youth and first-time voters. The Commission has instructed CEO, DEO and ERO to run a special campaign to add the names of such people. During SIR so far, 13.37 crore names have been reduced from the draft voter list of 30 states/union territories. According to the Election Commission, there are more than 96.88 crore voters in the country, that is, about 14.1% of the voters’ names were deleted from the SIR. SIR completed in 10 states and 3 union territories. 10 states and 3 union territories have been covered in the first and second phase of SIR. After SIR, BJP has won the assembly elections in Bihar, West Bengal, Puducherry and Assam. Congress alliance has won in Kerala and TVK has won in Tamil Nadu. Special Revision (SR) took place in Assam. Here also the BJP government returned. Third phase: SIR in 16 states including Delhi, Maharashtra The Election Commission had on May 14 announced Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in 16 states and 3 union territories including Haryana, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Delhi and Maharashtra. This is the third phase of SIR. The entire process will run from May 30 to December 23. During this period, verification of 36.73 crore voters is being done. Among the states where SIR will be held, Punjab, Uttarakhand and Manipur have assembly elections next year. Elections in the other 13 states will be held in 2028 and 2029. ——————————— Also read this news… Supreme Court judges are unanimous on the appointment of Election Commissioners: One said – Constitution bench of 5 judges should hear the hearing, the other opposed. The Supreme Court on Wednesday gave a divided decision on the 2023 law related to the appointment of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and two Election Commissioners. The bench of Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma had to decide whether the case should be sent to a larger bench (of five judges) or not. Read the full news…



Source link
[ad_3]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *