ओटीटी रिव्यू: क्रिमिनल जस्टिस सीजन 4: एक नए केस के साथ अदालत में माधव मिश्रा की वापसी, जहां आमने-सामने होगा प्यार, शक और परिवार

Actor Pankaj Tripathi has once again returned to court as Madhav Mishra. This time only 3 episodes of the series have been released on JioCinema. It was a risky decision to show a complex and emotional case in such low episodes. This may cause a little incomplete feeling to the audience, although there is eagerness about further episodes. Dainik Bhaskar has rated this series 3.5 out of 5.

What is the story of the series?

Eminent surgeon Dr. Raj Nagpal (Mohammad Zeeshan Job) is accused of killing his own girlfriend Roshni Saluja (Asha Negi). The matter is in the media headlines, the police have gathered evidence, but only then Madhav Mishra (Pankaj Tripathi) who starts looking at the case from a different perspective. As the case progresses, many characters come under suspicion. The story is such that after every episode, the audience gets into thinking. Is he really guilty whom everyone is believing?

How is the acting of Starcast?

Pankaj Tripathi in the role of Madhav Mishra keeps holding every scene in his funny, desi and esoteric way as usual. Mohammad Zeeshan Job played the role of Raj Nagpal in the series. His character has confusion, pain and restlessness. But some emotional scenes could have been further depths. Asha Negi plays Roshni Saluja. Despite the low screen time, he has played the character of a self -sufficient and emotional girl effectively.

Surveen Chawla’s character in the role of Raj’s wife is silent, but says a lot. However, the script could give them a little more expansion. Shweta Basu Prasad’s confidence in the character of the victim side’s private prosecutor account and aggressive style in the court is worth seeing. Accounts are a face that shows that when private feelings enter the battle of justice, then not just law, humanity is also at stake. His competition in front of Madhav gives the show a different edge. Among the rest of the artists, Mita Vashistha and Khushboo Atre have played their characters with good honesty.

How is direction and technical side?

Director Rohan Sippy has tried to balance the story between emotional and legal drama. Madhav’s entry, court debate and opening of case layers are good, but tension and drama weakening at some turning points.

The episodes are tight, but in some places scenes are eliminated in a hurry, which makes the effect slightly lighter. Dialogues have accuracy, which sometimes look light, or sometimes sharp. The screenplay lives at some more surface level, deepening and treatment could have been better. The camera has captured the emotions and the seriousness of the court well. Especially close shots are very effective.

How is music?

The background score fits according to the scene, but in a few moments the thrill and emotion could be further elevated.

The final Wordict of the series, see or not?

This series makes an interesting and sensitive start. There is suspense in the case, there is tension in the characters, and there are debates in the court. Limited of lower episodes has weakened emotional grip a bit, but keeps acting and twists the shows.