Mumbai10 minutes ago
- copy link
This picture is from the CCTV footage of a pub. Before the accident, the minor drank alcohol with his friends and left with the car.
The Bombay High Court will hear three petitions related to the Pune Porsche case on Thursday. These include petitions for the police to try the minor as an adult, the defense to return the seized Porsche car and the issuance of passport of the minor accused.
On August 29, the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) of Pune had adjourned the hearing of the three applications to September 26. The defence’s application for return of the confiscated Porsche car and the minor’s passport was also adjourned.
On August 22, a Pune court had rejected the bail plea of six accused in the case who were involved in tampering with the blood sample of the minor accused.
On the night of May 18, in Kalyani Nagar area of Pune, a 17 year 8 month old boy hit a bike rider working in the IT sector, due to which both died. The accused was drunk at the time of the incident. He was driving the car at a speed of 200 kilometers per hour.
This is the CCTV footage from near the accident spot. In this, a high speed Porsche car is seen passing through the road.
9 people arrested in Porsche case According to Pune Police, so far 9 people have been arrested in the case. On July 25, Pune Police registered a case against 7 people for criminal conspiracy, destroying evidence and changing blood samples. These include the minor’s parents, two doctors of Sasoon General Hospital, an employee and two middlemen.
25 June: The High Court had granted bail to the minor on 3 grounds…
1. The High Court said- the age of the accused is less than 18 years, it is necessary to keep that in mind The aunt of the accused boy had filed a petition in the Bombay High Court for his release. In this petition, it was said that the boy has been detained illegally. He should be released immediately. Justice Bharti Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande had cancelled the order of the Juvenile Justice Board to send the accused to observation home.
The bench had also noted that the order of the Juvenile Justice Board was illegal and was issued without jurisdiction. Amidst the reaction to the accident and public anger, the age of the accused minor was not taken into account. CCL is below 18 years of age, it is important to take her age into consideration.
2. Court said- Minor accused cannot be treated like big accused The court had said that we are bound by the law and the purpose of the Juvenile Justice Act and we have to deal with the accused in the same way as we would deal with any other child who violates the law. No matter how serious the crime is. The accused is undergoing rehabilitation, which is the main objective of the Juvenile Justice Act. He is also taking advice from a psychologist and this will continue in future as well.
3. The court had said- the accused is also in shock after the accident During the hearing, the court had said that it is true that two people died in this accident, but it is also true that the minor child is also in shock. The court had also asked the police on the basis of which rule the Juvenile Justice Board had changed its bail order. The bench had noted that the police had not filed a petition in any higher court against the bail order of the Juvenile Board.
Regarding this, the court asked what kind of remand is this? What power is used behind this remand? What is this process in which a person is ordered to be sent to custody after getting bail.
The minor was granted bail but now he has been kept in an observation home. Isn’t this like taking him hostage? We want to know what power you used to take this step. We thought that the Juvenile Justice Board would act responsibly.
900 page charge sheet, no name of minor On July 25, the police filed a 900-page charge sheet in the Pune Porsche case. However, the name of the 17-year-old minor accused was not included in it. The case of the minor is in the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB). 7 accused have been charged under sections related to criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence.
Source link
[ad_3]
