AI To Evaluate Exam Papers In CBSE Schools, Will This End Manual Checks?

Last Updated:September 09, 2025, 12:42 IST

India is not the first country to explore AI in assessment. United Kingdom experimented with algorithmic grading during the pandemic in 2020, when in-person exams were cancelled.

Will Artificial Intelligence in CBSE Schools Mean the End of Manual Marking?

The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has long been seen as the bellwether of change in Indian schooling. When CBSE introduces something new, from Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) to competency-based testing aligned with the National Education Policy 2020, it inevitably ripples across thousands of schools and millions of students.

Now, CBSE is piloting artificial intelligence based assessment tools in selected schools. These experiments are not about replacing teachers but about testing whether AI can evaluate essays, projects, or spoken tasks more consistently and efficiently.

The timing is not accidental. The education system is under increasing pressure to move beyond rote memory tests, and policymakers are searching for tools that can better capture real learning outcomes.

Why AI Is Entering the Exam Hall

For decades, Indian board exams have been criticised for reducing learning to three-hour memory battles. Students memorise textbook content, reproduce it in answer scripts, and move on, with little emphasis on creativity or critical thinking.

The NEP 2020 explicitly called for assessment reform, urging schools to focus on application, analysis, and problem solving. Artificial intelligence offers possibilities in this direction.

In pilot projects, AI is being used to evaluate essays for coherence and originality, to test spoken English for pronunciation and fluency, and to provide real-time feedback so students can learn from mistakes immediately. The hope is that AI can reduce the drudgery of manual correction and give teachers more space to focus on lesson quality and student mentoring.

Digital Evaluation Takes Root

Alongside AI experiments, CBSE has been investing in digital evaluation systems. In Delhi’s Dwarka area, the board has established a digital experience centre where Class 10 and 12 answer sheets are scanned and assessed on screen.

This reduces the logistical burden of transporting paper bundles, ensures greater transparency, and speeds up result processing. The move does not eliminate manual writing.

Students still write exams by hand, but evaluation shifts to digital platforms. This halfway model signals how CBSE might approach the future: preserve the traditional act of writing but modernise the way answers are checked and recorded.

Open-Book Assessments as a Parallel Reform

Another experiment under way is the gradual introduction of open-book assessments. Starting with Class 9 in the 2026–27 academic year, students will be able to consult study material while answering certain exam questions.

The pilot will cover subjects such as English, Mathematics, and Science, and is designed to test application rather than memory. This is still a manual, pen-and-paper process, but its spirit aligns with AI-driven feedback.

Both aim to make exams more about understanding than memorisation. Together, these reforms suggest that CBSE is layering multiple innovations, hoping to create a blended model of assessment for the next decade.

Early Responses From Classrooms

The pilots have sparked mixed reactions. Teachers appreciate that AI can reduce repetitive marking but worry about whether it can truly recognise creativity or cultural nuance in student answers. Some argue that algorithms may penalise unconventional but valid writing styles.

Students find instant feedback useful, particularly for language practice, but remain wary of whether a machine can understand their intent. Parents, meanwhile, are divided.

Urban families see AI as inevitable modernisation, while others fear it could widen the gap between well-resourced private schools and under-funded government institutions.

Challenges on the Road Ahead

Several hurdles make a complete shift to AI-based exams unlikely in the near future.

First, infrastructure gaps are wide. Many CBSE schools, particularly in rural districts, lack reliable electricity, internet access, or modern computer labs. Pilots in metro schools cannot be assumed to represent the entire ecosystem.

Second, teacher readiness is a major concern. AI tools require supervision, and their feedback must be contextualised. CBSE has partnered with technology firms such as IBM to provide workshops and bootcamps for teachers, but scaling this to over 20,000 affiliated schools will be an enormous challenge.

Third, issues of trust and transparency remain unresolved. If an AI tool gives a low score to a student essay, who takes responsibility? Unlike human examiners, algorithms are often opaque. Unless there are clear avenues for appeal and error correction, public confidence could be shaken.

Will Manual Exams Really Disappear?

For all the buzz, manual exams are not about to vanish. In India, board exams carry immense cultural and social weight. They decide college admissions, scholarships, and in many cases a student’s career path. Parents, teachers, and policymakers are unlikely to accept a wholesale shift to AI grading in the short term.

What is more likely is a hybrid model. Students will continue writing by hand in exam halls. Their scripts may be scanned and evaluated digitally. AI may assist in checking grammar, plagiarism, or structure, while teachers retain the final word. Oral and project-based assessments may increasingly use AI as a support tool, but the formal, summative exam will remain recognisably manual.

Learning From Global Experiments

India is not the first country to explore AI in assessment. The United Kingdom experimented with algorithmic grading during the pandemic in 2020, when in-person exams were cancelled. The results led to controversy: students from disadvantaged schools were disproportionately downgraded, prompting public protests and a rollback of the system.

Singapore has tested AI-driven language tools in classrooms but insists on strong teacher oversight. These global cases act as cautionary tales. They underline why CBSE is moving slowly, choosing pilots and partial rollouts rather than sweeping mandates. The risks of undermining trust in exams are too high.

The Shape of a Hybrid Future

Taken together, CBSE’s reforms point toward a layered future:

• Writing remains manual, preserving accessibility and tradition.
• Evaluation shifts to digital, with scanned answer sheets and faster results.
• AI supports teachers, handling repetitive checks and generating feedback.
• Alternative formats like open-book exams and project work become more common.

This approach blends the familiarity of manual exams with the efficiency of digital tools. It also ensures that teachers remain central, not sidelined, in the process.

Why This Shift Matters

For students, these reforms signal a gradual shift away from rote memorisation toward skills such as critical thinking, communication, and adaptability. For teachers, they offer relief from repetitive correction work but also demand retraining and adjustment to new roles.

For parents, it may require a mental shift: success will increasingly be defined not just by marks but by skills and competencies. For policymakers, the challenge lies in ensuring that reforms do not deepen inequality between schools that can afford technology and those that cannot.

A Turning Point, Not an End

The arrival of AI in CBSE classrooms does not spell the end of manual exams. Instead, it marks the beginning of a new phase where tradition and technology coexist. Exams in India are unlikely to become fully digital or AI-graded anytime soon. What will happen is slower, subtler: a re-engineering of assessment systems to blend efficiency with fairness, and memory with meaning.

Manual exams will not disappear. They will evolve. And in that evolution, India’s classrooms will reflect a balancing act between chalk and algorithm, between pen and pixel, between the trusted rituals of the past and the uncertain possibilities of the future.

News Desk

The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d…Read More

The News Desk is a team of passionate editors and writers who break and analyse the most important events unfolding in India and abroad. From live updates to exclusive reports to in-depth explainers, the Desk d… Read More

The timing is not accidental. The education system is under increasing pressure to move beyond rote memory tests, and policymakers are searching for tools that can better capture real learning outcomes.

Why AI Is Entering the Exam Hall

For decades, Indian board exams have been criticised for reducing learning to three-hour memory battles. Students memorise textbook content, reproduce it in answer scripts, and move on, with little emphasis on creativity or critical thinking.

The NEP 2020 explicitly called for assessment reform, urging schools to focus on application, analysis, and problem solving. Artificial intelligence offers possibilities in this direction.

In pilot projects, AI is being used to evaluate essays for coherence and originality, to test spoken English for pronunciation and fluency, and to provide real-time feedback so students can learn from mistakes immediately. The hope is that AI can reduce the drudgery of manual correction and give teachers more space to focus on lesson quality and student mentoring.

Digital Evaluation Takes Root

Alongside AI experiments, CBSE has been investing in digital evaluation systems. In Delhi’s Dwarka area, the board has established a digital experience centre where Class 10 and 12 answer sheets are scanned and assessed on screen.

This reduces the logistical burden of transporting paper bundles, ensures greater transparency, and speeds up result processing. The move does not eliminate manual writing.

Students still write exams by hand, but evaluation shifts to digital platforms. This halfway model signals how CBSE might approach the future: preserve the traditional act of writing but modernise the way answers are checked and recorded.

Open-Book Assessments as a Parallel Reform

Another experiment under way is the gradual introduction of open-book assessments. Starting with Class 9 in the 2026–27 academic year, students will be able to consult study material while answering certain exam questions.

The pilot will cover subjects such as English, Mathematics, and Science, and is designed to test application rather than memory. This is still a manual, pen-and-paper process, but its spirit aligns with AI-driven feedback.

Both aim to make exams more about understanding than memorisation. Together, these reforms suggest that CBSE is layering multiple innovations, hoping to create a blended model of assessment for the next decade.

Early Responses From Classrooms

The pilots have sparked mixed reactions. Teachers appreciate that AI can reduce repetitive marking but worry about whether it can truly recognise creativity or cultural nuance in student answers. Some argue that algorithms may penalise unconventional but valid writing styles.

Students find instant feedback useful, particularly for language practice, but remain wary of whether a machine can understand their intent. Parents, meanwhile, are divided.

Urban families see AI as inevitable modernisation, while others fear it could widen the gap between well-resourced private schools and under-funded government institutions.

Challenges on the Road Ahead

Several hurdles make a complete shift to AI-based exams unlikely in the near future.

First, infrastructure gaps are wide. Many CBSE schools, particularly in rural districts, lack reliable electricity, internet access, or modern computer labs. Pilots in metro schools cannot be assumed to represent the entire ecosystem.

Second, teacher readiness is a major concern. AI tools require supervision, and their feedback must be contextualised. CBSE has partnered with technology firms such as IBM to provide workshops and bootcamps for teachers, but scaling this to over 20,000 affiliated schools will be an enormous challenge.

Third, issues of trust and transparency remain unresolved. If an AI tool gives a low score to a student essay, who takes responsibility? Unlike human examiners, algorithms are often opaque. Unless there are clear avenues for appeal and error correction, public confidence could be shaken.

Will Manual Exams Really Disappear?

For all the buzz, manual exams are not about to vanish. In India, board exams carry immense cultural and social weight. They decide college admissions, scholarships, and in many cases a student’s career path. Parents, teachers, and policymakers are unlikely to accept a wholesale shift to AI grading in the short term.

What is more likely is a hybrid model. Students will continue writing by hand in exam halls. Their scripts may be scanned and evaluated digitally. AI may assist in checking grammar, plagiarism, or structure, while teachers retain the final word. Oral and project-based assessments may increasingly use AI as a support tool, but the formal, summative exam will remain recognisably manual.

Learning From Global Experiments

India is not the first country to explore AI in assessment. The United Kingdom experimented with algorithmic grading during the pandemic in 2020, when in-person exams were cancelled. The results led to controversy: students from disadvantaged schools were disproportionately downgraded, prompting public protests and a rollback of the system.

Singapore has tested AI-driven language tools in classrooms but insists on strong teacher oversight. These global cases act as cautionary tales. They underline why CBSE is moving slowly, choosing pilots and partial rollouts rather than sweeping mandates. The risks of undermining trust in exams are too high.

The Shape of a Hybrid Future

Taken together, CBSE’s reforms point toward a layered future:

• Writing remains manual, preserving accessibility and tradition.
• Evaluation shifts to digital, with scanned answer sheets and faster results.
• AI supports teachers, handling repetitive checks and generating feedback.
• Alternative formats like open-book exams and project work become more common.

This approach blends the familiarity of manual exams with the efficiency of digital tools. It also ensures that teachers remain central, not sidelined, in the process.

Why This Shift Matters

For students, these reforms signal a gradual shift away from rote memorisation toward skills such as critical thinking, communication, and adaptability. For teachers, they offer relief from repetitive correction work but also demand retraining and adjustment to new roles.

For parents, it may require a mental shift: success will increasingly be defined not just by marks but by skills and competencies. For policymakers, the challenge lies in ensuring that reforms do not deepen inequality between schools that can afford technology and those that cannot.

A Turning Point, Not an End

The arrival of AI in CBSE classrooms does not spell the end of manual exams. Instead, it marks the beginning of a new phase where tradition and technology coexist. Exams in India are unlikely to become fully digital or AI-graded anytime soon. What will happen is slower, subtler: a re-engineering of assessment systems to blend efficiency with fairness, and memory with meaning.

Manual exams will not disappear. They will evolve. And in that evolution, India’s classrooms will reflect a balancing act between chalk and algorithm, between pen and pixel, between the trusted rituals of the past and the uncertain possibilities of the future.

Scan the QR code to download the News18 app and enjoy a seamless news experience anytime, anywhere