New Delhi3 minutes ago
- Copy link
The fight over copyright violations between news publishers and Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms globally has intensified.
Japan’s two major media companies, Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun have filed a case against the AI search engine purpose. It is alleged that his news was copied, stored and used without permission.
Like Japanese publishers, many Indian news publishers have started legal action against AI platforms or are preparing to do it. Indian publishers are also facing mass scraping of their content.
News used to train AI system
The hard -ready news and analysis of Indian publishers are being used to train and respond to the AI system. The publishers are neither being given its credit, nor is the traffic sent on their platform. This is not only affecting their earnings, but the credibility of journalism is also in danger due to the news introduced by AI wrong or distorted.
ANI filed a case against OpenAI
In November 2024, in the Delhi High Court, Asia News International (ANI) filed India’s first major case against OpenAI. ANI alleges that his copyred news was used to train Chatgpt without permission and some AI output was given incorrect information in the name of ANI. This hurt his credibility.
OpenAI said that it does not work in India, so the court does not form jurisdiction, but Indian legal experts say that this does not end the company’s responsibility. The Delhi High Court further expanded the case, in which the Indian music industry was also allowed to join, causing copyright concern not to limit only to journalism.
DNPA said- AI platforms are taking advantage of journalists for free
Digital News Publishers Association (DNPA) says AI platforms are taking advantage of the hard work of Indian journalists and editors for free. There is no clean legal or regulatory structure in India that control the use of copyred materials for AI training. DNPA says that this policy emptiness is endangering the economic stability of journalism and the right to access to the trusted information of people.
New York Times filed a case against OpenAI
The New York Times in the US has filed a case against OpenAI. In Europe, publishers like Konde Nast and Der Spiegle made a licensing deal with AI companies, while some are blocking AI Crolars.
The cases of Nikkei and Asahi Shimbun in Japan show the seriousness of the issue. In both cases, compensation of more than 2.2 billion yen has been sought. The BBC has also sent a legal notice to AI platforms to stop using its content. Some AI companies have introduced a revenue-sharing agreement with publishers, showing the possibility of a balanced and collaborative model.
Demand to implement appropriate revenue-sharing system
Indian publishers want the government to intervene at the earliest and fix accountability for AI companies. DNPA has demanded policy makers that AI platforms have to get permission before using copyred materials and apply proper revenue-sharing systems. He says that India should not lag behind in protecting the rights of publishers, as well as AI innovation should also be promoted.
DNPA said- India should create such a balanced structure
A DNPA spokesperson said, “AI innovation is necessary, but it cannot be weakened by journalism, which is the basis of democracy.” Publishers believe that India should create a balanced structure in which AI companies work under transparent and fair licensing systems, publishers get proper compensation for their hard work and people depend on reliable, verified journalism, not uncontrolled AI sessions.
DNPA represents India’s largest and reliable digital, print and television news publishers. It has reiterated the economic stability of news ecosystem and its commitment to maintain the values of independent, fair journalism.
Source link
[ad_3]
