The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard a petition related to acid attack incidents. During this he said that guidelines have been made, yet incidents are happening. This means there is something missing. The court asked the government to implement the guidelines banning the sale of acid in all states. Also give an affidavit stating what will be the necessary steps to stop the misuse of acid. The bench of CJI Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice V. Mohana said that even today acid is easily available in the market. The Centre-States will have to solve this together. The court asked the Center to fix accountability. The bench said that the Central Government should not assume that after issuing the guidelines, its responsibility has fallen on the states. The court also asked whether it had sought clarification from any state regarding the incidents. The court said, “Can you show us a circular in which a state has been asked how the incidents happened despite your guidelines? Where is the accountability of the officials of the monitoring agencies there?” The bench said that issuing instructions by writing sympathetic language in the circular will not serve the purpose. If incidents are increasing, it means the policy has failed miserably.” Despite the guidelines, implementation is weak. Additional Solicitor General Archana Pathak Dave, appearing for the Centre, said that detailed guidelines had been sent to the states regarding the ban on retail sale of acid. He said that states have also made rules, but their implementation is very weak. The Supreme Court said that there are many shortcomings in the guidelines, which people are taking wrong advantage of. The court said that the Center and the states will have to work together to remove these shortcomings. Suggestion to increase punishment in acid attack cases: The Supreme Court had earlier expressed concern over the alarming increase in barbaric acid attack cases. The court had asked the Center to consider increasing the punishment in such crimes. The court had also suggested that the onus should be placed on the accused to prove that he is not guilty. The Supreme Court gave this order during the hearing on the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) of acid attack victim Shaheen Malik. Shaheen Malik has demanded that acid attack victims be included in the category of disabled persons. With this they will be able to get the benefits of government welfare schemes.
Source link
[ad_3]
सुप्रीम कोर्ट बोला-एसिड बिक्री पर गाइडलाइन, फिर भी हमले क्यों: इसका मतलब- पॉलिसी फेल है; राज्य इसे सख्ती से लागू कराएं, अफसरों की जवाबदेही तय हो
