After the Supreme Court’s stay on the new rules of UGC, the controversy arising in the country’s politics and university campuses seems to be stopping for the time being, but the question is whether this pause is permanent or in the coming days this issue will return with renewed vigor and more acuteness. The apex court has put on hold the new rules of UGC, which came into effect 17 days ago, till the next hearing and has sought answers from the Central Government and UGC. Till then the old rule of 2012 will remain applicable.
After this decision, while many organizations and students of the upper caste community were seen distributing sweets on the streets, there is an atmosphere of confusion and anxiety among the backward and deprived classes. Supreme Court After this decision, an atmosphere of celebration was seen in many districts of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar. In cities like Lucknow, Mathura, Chandauli and Gorakhpur, people of the upper caste community distributed laddus, pedas and raised slogans. From sages and saints to student organizations called it a victory of justice. The question is, will the backward classes accept the decision by which the upper classes are feeling relieved?
In fact, ugc The new rules were linked to complaints of caste-based discrimination on college and university campuses. The purpose of these rules was said to be to prevent discrimination, but upper caste organizations alleged that the rules were vague and there was a high possibility of their misuse. Based on this apprehension, the Supreme Court made strong comments during the hearing.
Supreme Court made strict remarks
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said that the rules are prima facie vague and the possibility of their misuse cannot be ruled out. The court also raised the question as to why there was a need to define caste-based discrimination separately when the definition of discrimination already exists. CJI Surya Kant’s most talked about remarks were when he said, “Whatever progress we have made towards a casteless society, are we now going backwards again?”
These are the comments, after which the protesters from the upper caste community felt that the Supreme Court had seriously listened to their concerns. It is noteworthy that the demonstrations on this issue were not limited to the streets only. The protest reached the BJP office in Hapur, slogans of ‘Down with BJP’ were raised and at many places posters were put up asking not to vote for the leaders. The situation was such that many MPs and ministers were seen avoiding speaking openly in front of the camera.
stir in political circles
Another interesting aspect in this entire movement was that the saints and religious faces were more vocal than the political leaders. Names like Pandit Dhirendra Shastri of Bageshwar Dham, former Governor Kalraj Mishra, Annapurnagiri Mahamandaleshwar and lyricist Manoj Muntashir came out openly. His argument was that such rules can work to divide the Hindu society.
At the same time, the opposition also read this decision in their own way. Samajwadi Party leaders Ram Gopal Yadav and Akhilesh Yadav said that the system should be such that neither the guilty are spared nor the innocent are treated unfairly. On the other hand, Uttar Pradesh Deputy CM Keshav Prasad Maurya called the decision a matter of happiness, while Union Minister Giriraj Singh said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi never did politics of discrimination.
Now, in this entire incident, five such questions have emerged, which will decide the direction of this dispute in the future.
first question: Will the resentment of the upper caste community end completely after the Supreme Court’s ban, or is it just a temporary relief?
second question: Will the backward and deprived sections feel insecure due to the rules which have been put on hold?
Third question: Was the government aware of the political sensitivity of this entire controversy, that is why the rules were not openly defended in the Supreme Court?
Fourth question: If the rules were truly ambiguous, why were they implemented without extensive dialogue and expert advice?
The fifth and most important question: Was this entire matter part of an attempt to solve caste equations in the coming elections?
Now the next hearing will be held on March 19
It is also worth noting that during the hearing in the Supreme Court, no sharp objection was raised from the government. It is a matter of discussion in the circles of politics whether the government, in view of the increasing pressure of social discontent, thought it better to maintain distance from confrontation for the time being. Now the next hearing is to be held on March 19. Till then the 2012 rule will remain in force. This means that for the time being, the new framework for complaints regarding caste-based discrimination in colleges and universities has been put on hold.
Now the next hearing to be held on March 19 will decide what will be the future of the new rules of UGC.
—- End —-
Source link
[ad_3]
